chore: initialize insar management system v2
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,120 @@
|
||||
# Phase 4 Unified-Environment Decision
|
||||
|
||||
Updated: 2026-04-06
|
||||
|
||||
## Decision
|
||||
|
||||
Current experiment preference:
|
||||
|
||||
- prefer the unified WSL environment for SBAS experiment work
|
||||
|
||||
Current production safety rule:
|
||||
|
||||
- do not replace or mutate the existing D-InSAR production environment
|
||||
- keep pair-oriented D-InSAR on the existing WSL `isce2` env
|
||||
- keep the current backend/public D-InSAR entry unchanged
|
||||
|
||||
Current environment split:
|
||||
|
||||
- D-InSAR production baseline:
|
||||
- `isce2`
|
||||
- SBAS experiment preferred runtime:
|
||||
- `isce2_mintpy_v1`
|
||||
|
||||
## Why This Decision Is Reasonable
|
||||
|
||||
The unified env has now completed the full current experiment chain:
|
||||
|
||||
- MintPy command invocation without the `isce` bridge
|
||||
- `load_data`
|
||||
- strict-mask generation
|
||||
- `modify_network -> velocity`
|
||||
- publish export to geocoded HDF5, GeoTIFF, preview, and `manifest.json`
|
||||
|
||||
This makes the unified env a valid experiment baseline.
|
||||
|
||||
At the same time, the existing pair-oriented D-InSAR route is already working and should not be destabilized just to simplify the SBAS experiment runtime.
|
||||
|
||||
The safest rule is therefore:
|
||||
|
||||
- let SBAS experiments move forward in a separate unified env
|
||||
- do not touch the current `isce2` production env used by D-InSAR
|
||||
|
||||
## Evidence
|
||||
|
||||
Successful unified env:
|
||||
|
||||
- `/home/administrator/miniconda3/envs/isce2_mintpy_v1`
|
||||
|
||||
Successful unified SBAS work directory:
|
||||
|
||||
- `/mnt/z/Code/Insar_management_system_v2/experiments/isce2_sbas_timeseries/scratch/lt1a_strip1_hh_descending_e123p3_n46p1/stack_work/mintpy_sbas_unified_v1`
|
||||
|
||||
Successful unified publish directory:
|
||||
|
||||
- `/mnt/z/Code/Insar_management_system_v2/experiments/isce2_sbas_timeseries/scratch/lt1a_strip1_hh_descending_e123p3_n46p1/publish/mintpy_sbas_unified_v1`
|
||||
|
||||
Matched quality indicators:
|
||||
|
||||
- `maskAllValid`:
|
||||
- `1219001 / 4076199`
|
||||
- `29.91%`
|
||||
- `maskTempCoh`:
|
||||
- `62987 / 4076199`
|
||||
- `1.55%`
|
||||
|
||||
Key package difference:
|
||||
|
||||
- current `isce2` env does not provide the MintPy-side package set needed for this SBAS route
|
||||
- current `isce2_mintpy_v1` env includes:
|
||||
- `mintpy`
|
||||
- `cartopy`
|
||||
- `pyaps3`
|
||||
- `pykml`
|
||||
- `cvxopt`
|
||||
|
||||
## What This Decision Does Not Mean
|
||||
|
||||
It does not mean:
|
||||
|
||||
- the backend should immediately switch to unified-env execution
|
||||
- the bridge route must be deleted now
|
||||
- the current D-InSAR runtime should be modified
|
||||
|
||||
It only means:
|
||||
|
||||
- for the next experiment steps, unified env is the preferred path
|
||||
- for current production safety, `isce2` remains untouched
|
||||
|
||||
## Required Guardrails
|
||||
|
||||
For the next phase, keep these rules:
|
||||
|
||||
- do not install MintPy into the existing `isce2` env
|
||||
- do not redirect current D-InSAR scripts to `isce2_mintpy_v1`
|
||||
- do not remove the bridge-based helpers yet
|
||||
- keep all SBAS work in experiment scripts, notes, and scratch directories
|
||||
|
||||
## Reproducibility
|
||||
|
||||
Environment snapshots should be exported and kept with the experiment record.
|
||||
|
||||
Current snapshot command:
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
wsl -d Ubuntu-24.04 bash /mnt/z/Code/Insar_management_system_v2/experiments/isce2_sbas_timeseries/scripts/export_phase4_env_snapshots_ubuntu2404.sh /mnt/z/Code/Insar_management_system_v2/experiments/isce2_sbas_timeseries/configs/env_snapshots/20260406
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Next Stable Experiment Steps
|
||||
|
||||
Before any system integration work:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Keep the unified env as the default SBAS experiment runtime.
|
||||
2. Preserve environment snapshots for both `isce2` and `isce2_mintpy_v1`.
|
||||
3. Write one comparison note focused on:
|
||||
- runtime simplicity
|
||||
- reproducibility
|
||||
- remaining workarounds
|
||||
- risk to D-InSAR production
|
||||
4. Optionally repeat the chain on one more LT-1 sample stack.
|
||||
5. Only after the experiment is stable, design the system integration boundary.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user